Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLa Ley de Responsabilidad Civil Nuclear (NLA) de Canada, donde se establece un regimen estricto de compensacion y de responsabilidad civil del operador y cuyo objetivo es proteger los intereses del publico en el caso de producirse danos y perjuicios civiles a causa de un incidente nuclear, ha estado en vigor desde la decada de los 70. En la NLA actual, se fija un limite de 75 millones de dolares canadienses (CAD) para los operadores de las instalaciones de generacion de energia nuclear en Canada. En la actualidad, el Gobierno de Canada es responsable de los danos que superen los 75 millones de CAD. Igual que otras muchas jurisdicciones, el Gobierno Canadiense ha intentado sustituir la actual Ley de Responsabilidad Civil por Danos Nucleares con un regimen especifico de responsabilidad civil respecto a los incidentes nucleares. En el nuevo regimen, en caso de aprobarse, se aumentara la responsabilidad civil del operador desde la cifra actual de 75 millones de CAD hasta 650 millones de CAD, o incluso mas. En este articulo, se hace un resumen de la propuesta de Canada de establecer un marco para la responsabilidad civil y del requisito de pagar compensacion por los danos provocados por un incidente nuclear. EnglishCanada’s Nuclear Liability Act which sets out a compensation and civil liability regime, of strict operator liability, to protect the interest of the public in the event that civil injury and damages arises from a nuclear incident has been in effect since the 1970’s. Under the current NLA, a limit of CAD $75 million in liability has been set for operators of nuclear power generating facilities in Canada. Damages above and beyond CAD $75 million are currently the responsibility of the Government of Canada. Like many other jurisdictions, the Canadian Government has been seeking to replace the current Nuclear Liability Act with a specific civil liability regime with respect to nuclear incidents. The new regime, if passed will increase the operator liability from the current CAD $75 million to $650 million or higher. This paper provides an outline of Canada’s proposed establishment of a form of civil liability and of a requirement to pay compensation in respect of damage caused by a nuclear incident.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".