MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917051748 · doi:10.7202/1056245ar

Hannah Arendt et Antigone : perspectives sur la désobéissance civile

2019· article· fr· W2917051748 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marianne Di Croce

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyConscienceHumanitiesEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aux yeux de la philosophe Hannah Arendt, la désobéissance civile comme objection de conscience se situe sur le terrain de la morale individuelle plutôt que sur le terrain collectif du politique. L’auteure propose dans son article une lecture arendtienne d’ Antigone (de Sophocle), figure classique de la désobéissance civile laissée de côté par Arendt, pour voir dans quelle mesure Antigone pourrait être qualifiée d’actrice politique par la philosophe. Cet exercice révèle les forces et les limites de la conception arendtienne de la désobéissance civile, laquelle valorise l’action en commun, mais néglige la portée politique de l’objection de conscience, en particulier pour les personnes marginalisées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicHannah Arendt's Political PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207