MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917106292 · doi:10.14778/3303753.3303756

Correlation constraint shortest path over large multi-relation graphs

2019· article· en· W2917106292 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaofei Zhang, M. TAMER ÖZSU

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the VLDB Endowment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Theoretical computer scienceComputer scienceReachabilityVertex (graph theory)Tree traversalEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionShortest path problemLongest path problemMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsGraphAlgorithmData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-relation graphs intuitively capture the heterogeneous correlations among real-world entities by allowing multiple types of relationships to be represented as entity-connecting edges, i.e., two entities could be correlated with more than one type of relationship. This is important in various applications such as social network analysis, ecology, and bio-informatics. Existing studies on these graphs usually consider an edge label constraint perspective, where each edge contains only one label and each edge is considered independently. For example, there are lines of research focusing on reachability between two vertices under a set of edge label constraints, or finding paths whose consecutive edge labels satisfy a user-specified logical expression. This is too restricted in real graphs, and in this work, we define a generic correlation constraint on multi-relation graphs from the perspective of vertex correlations, where a correlation can be defined recursively. Specifically, we formalize and investigate the shortest path problem over large multi-relation graphs in the presence of both necessity and denial constraints, which have various real applications. We show that it is nontrivial to apply conventional graph traversal algorithms (e.g., BFS or DFS) to address the challenge. To effectively reduce the search space, we propose a Hybrid Relation Encoding method, a.k.a. HyRE, to encode both topological and relation information in a compact way. We conduct extensive experiments over large real-world graphs to validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the VLDB EndowmentSame topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207