MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917106292 · doi:10.14778/3303753.3303756

Correlation constraint shortest path over large multi-relation graphs

2019· article· en· W2917106292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the VLDB Endowment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Theoretical computer scienceComputer scienceReachabilityVertex (graph theory)Tree traversalEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionShortest path problemLongest path problemMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsGraphAlgorithmData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-relation graphs intuitively capture the heterogeneous correlations among real-world entities by allowing multiple types of relationships to be represented as entity-connecting edges, i.e., two entities could be correlated with more than one type of relationship. This is important in various applications such as social network analysis, ecology, and bio-informatics. Existing studies on these graphs usually consider an edge label constraint perspective, where each edge contains only one label and each edge is considered independently. For example, there are lines of research focusing on reachability between two vertices under a set of edge label constraints, or finding paths whose consecutive edge labels satisfy a user-specified logical expression. This is too restricted in real graphs, and in this work, we define a generic correlation constraint on multi-relation graphs from the perspective of vertex correlations, where a correlation can be defined recursively. Specifically, we formalize and investigate the shortest path problem over large multi-relation graphs in the presence of both necessity and denial constraints, which have various real applications. We show that it is nontrivial to apply conventional graph traversal algorithms (e.g., BFS or DFS) to address the challenge. To effectively reduce the search space, we propose a Hybrid Relation Encoding method, a.k.a. HyRE, to encode both topological and relation information in a compact way. We conduct extensive experiments over large real-world graphs to validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it