MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917110306

Impact of Crop Improvement and Management: Winter-Sown Chickpea in Syria

2018· book· en· W2917110306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed Mazid

Bibliographic record

VenueMELSpace (ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas)) · 2018
Typebook
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCropCrop managementAgronomyGeographyAgroforestryEnvironmental scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an annual grain legume or 'pulse' crop used extensively for human consumption. Dried chickpea seed is commonly used in soup in India, while in the Middle East and elsewhere it is more frequently cooked and blended with rice dishes. The primary use in Syria is to prepare the homus bet-hina dish or falafel. Major chickpea producing countries include India, Pakistan, Mexico, Turkey, Canada, Syria, and Australia. Chickpea accounts for over 20% of world pulse production, and is the most important pulse crop after dry bean and pea. Chickpea provides important economic advantages to smallholder farm households: it is a source of protein (an alternative to meat) and a source of cash income, and improves soil quality when grown as a break crop in cereal-dominated farming systems. Despite the importance of chickpea, yields in Syria – and many other developing countries – have remained very low. The major constraints to productivity are the low yield potential of landraces, their susceptibility to biotic and abiotic stresses, and poor cultural practices. In Syria, chickpea is traditionally sown during spring on conserved soil moisture, if winter rainfall has been sufficient. Productivity is limited mainly by terminal drought and vascular wilt. With increasing pressure on land in Syria, profitability of spring chickpea is declining relative to other crops. This is a major reason for fluctuating or declining area and production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMELSpace (ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas))Same topicGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesFrench-language works237,207