MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917204809

“Iceberg”: un modèle de diffusion restreinte pour un réseau de confiance entre pairs

2006· preprint· fr· W2917204809 on OpenAlexaff
Annie Danzart, Vincent Oria, Trung Tien Phan Quang, Jean-Marc Saglio

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2006
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcebergHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publishing worldwide appears quickly dangerous to beginners in web logging due to its “share to all or share to none” and is very far from the gossiping model used in P2P (neighbor to neighbor) networks; this project explored a restrictive publishing called the iceberg visibility model, based on self-defined views offered (with associated RSS feeds) to self-defined groups of self-registered readers (eventually subscribers to RSS feeds).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0080.008
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207