Continental collisions and the origin of subcrustal continental earthquakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existence of subcrustal continental earthquakes beneath the Alpine–Himalayan Belt was recognised more than 60 years ago. There is general agreement that most of those beneath the western part of the belt in the Mediterranean result from the subduction of oceanic lithosphere. There is less agreement about the origin of those beneath Vrancea in Romania, the Hindu Kush, and the Pamir. Because there is little evidence for the former existence of oceanic lithosphere beneath these regions, many authors have argued that these seismic zones result from the separation of the mantle part of the continental lithosphere from the crust before it sinks into the mantle. However, this model has become steadily less satisfactory. Detailed studies of the depth of earthquakes beneath all stable regions of continents have shown that substantial subcrustal earthquakes, with magnitudes greater than 5.5, are rare. We show that this distribution is controlled by temperature, with material hotter than ∼600 °C being aseismic. This simple rule accounts for the distribution of almost all earthquakes in oceanic and continental lithosphere, including those in subduction zones. We argue that the subcrustal continental earthquakes must also result from the subduction of oceanic lithosphere. This proposal is not new but has generally been dismissed because of the lack of surface geological evidence that suitable pieces of oceanic lithosphere existed. However, the depth distribution of continental earthquakes makes it steadily harder to avoid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".