MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917470685 · doi:10.1128/jb.00030-19

Identification of Redox Partners of the Thiol-Disulfide Oxidoreductase SdbA in Streptococcus gordonii

2019· article· en· W2917470685 on OpenAlexafffund
Naif A. Jalal, Lauren Davey, Scott A. Halperin, Song F. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRedox biology and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsBiologyStreptococcus gordoniiOxidoreductaseThiolBiochemistryIdentification (biology)RedoxMicrobiologyBacterial proteinDisulfide bondComputational biologyStreptococcaceaeEnzymeChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streptococcus gordonii is a commensal bacterium of the human dental plaque. Previously, we identified an enzyme, SdbA, that forms disulfide bonds in substrate proteins and plays a role in a number of cellular processes in S. gordonii . Here, we identified the redox partners of SdbA. We showed that SdbA has multiple redox partners, SdbB and CcdA2, forming a complex oxidative protein-folding pathway. This pathway is essential for autolysis, bacteriocin production, genetic competence, and extracellular DNA (eDNA) release in S. gordonii . These cellular processes are considered to be important for the success of S. gordonii as a dental plaque organism. This is the first example of an oxidative protein-folding pathway in Gram-positive bacteria that consists of an enzyme that uses multiple redox partners to function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicRedox biology and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207