MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917507868 · doi:10.1101/564476

Dynamic compression and expansion in a classifying recurrent network

2019· preprint· en· W2917507868 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Farrell, Stefano Recanatesi, Guillaume Lajoie, Eric Shea‐Brown

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCurse of dimensionalityComputer scienceDimensionality reductionRecurrent neural networkArtificial intelligenceStochastic gradient descentGradient descentGeneralizationArtificial neural networkTask (project management)ChaoticMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recordings of neural circuits in the brain reveal extraordinary dynamical richness and high variability. At the same time, dimensionality reduction techniques generally uncover low-dimensional structures underlying these dynamics when tasks are performed. In general, it is still an open question what determines the dimensionality of activity in neural circuits, and what the functional role of this dimensionality in task learning is. In this work we probe these issues using a recurrent artificial neural network (RNN) model trained by stochastic gradient descent to discriminate inputs. The RNN family of models has recently shown promise in revealing principles behind brain function. Through simulations and mathematical analysis, we show how the dimensionality of RNN activity depends on the task parameters and evolves over time and over stages of learning. We find that common solutions produced by the network naturally compress dimensionality, while variability-inducing chaos can expand it. We show how chaotic networks balance these two factors to solve the discrimination task with high accuracy and good generalization properties. These findings shed light on mechanisms by which artificial neural networks solve tasks while forming compact representations that may generalize well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207