MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917527325 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2019.1800166

A Framework of Network Connectivity Management in Multi-Clouds Infrastructure

2019· article· en· W2917527325 on OpenAlexaff
Anwer Al‐Dulaimi, Shahid Mumtaz, Saba Al–Rubaye, Siming Zhang, I Chih‐Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsExfo Electro-Optical Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingVirtual networkComputer networkDistributed computingNetwork virtualizationTestbedScalabilityVirtualizationRadio access networkOrchestrationNetwork topologyCore networkNetwork managementBase stationOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NFV transformation is gaining incredible momentum from mobile operators as one of the significant solutions to improve resource allocation and system scalability in 5G networks. However, the ultra-dense deployments in 5G create high volumes of traffic that pushes the physical and virtual resources of cloud-based networks to edge limits. Consider a distributed cloud, replacing the core network with virtual entities in the form of VNFs still requires efficient integration with various underlying hardware technologies. Therefore, orchestrating the distribution of load between cloud geo-data centers starts by instantiating virtual and physical network topologies that connect involved fronthaul with relevant VNFs. In this article, we provide a framework to manage calls within 5G network clusters for efficient utilization of computational resources and also to prevent unnecessary signaling. We also propose a new scheme to instantiate virtual tunnels for call forwarding between network clusters leading to new logic networks that combine geo-data centers and fronthaul. To facilitate service chaining in cloud, we propose a new enhanced network functions virtualization management and orchestration (E-MANO) that extends telemetry services to the radio access network for instant monitoring of available radio resources. We provide analysis and testbed results in support of our proposals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless CommunicationsSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207