Impaired glucose homeostasis in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3-transgenic mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucose homeostasis was examined in male transgenic (Tg) mice that overexpressed the human insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 cDNA, driven by either the cytomegalovirus (CMV) or the phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) promoter. The Tg mice of both lineages demonstrated increased serum levels of human (h) IGFBP-3 and total IGF-I compared with wild-type (Wt) mice. Fasting blood glucose levels were significantly elevated in 8-wk-old CMV-binding protein (CMVBP)-3- and PGK binding protein (PGKBP)-3-Tg mice compared with Wt mice: 6.35 +/- 0.22 and 5.22 +/- 0.39 vs. 3.99 +/- 0.26 mmol/l, respectively. Plasma insulin was significantly elevated only in CMVBP-3-Tg mice. The responses to a glucose challenge were significantly increased in both Tg strains: area under the glucose curve = 1,824 +/- 65 and 1,910 +/- 115 vs. 1,590 +/- 67 mmol. l(-1). min for CMVBP-3, PGKBP-3, and Wt mice, respectively. The hypoglycemic effects of insulin and IGF-I were significantly attenuated in Tg mice compared with Wt mice. There were no differences in adipose tissue resistin, retinoid X receptor-alpha, or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma mRNA levels between Tg and Wt mice. Uptake of 2-deoxyglucose was reduced in muscle and adipose tissue from Tg mice compared with Wt mice. These data demonstrate that overexpression of hIGFBP-3 results in fasting hyperglycemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and insulin resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".