MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917574401 · doi:10.5603/ait.2017.0005

Optymalizacja funkcji układu krążenia w okresie okołooperacyjnym u chorych poddawanych operacjom niekardiochirurgicznym — stanowisko Sekcji Kardiotorakoanestezjologii Polskiego Towarzystwa Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii. Część 1

2017· article· pl· W2917574401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesiology Intensive Therapy · 2017
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeIntensive careHemodynamicsCardiac surgeryCardiothoracic surgeryAnesthesiaCardiac outputSurgeryIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Kucewicz-Czech E, Krzych ŁJ, Ligowski M. Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery — a position statement from the Cardiac and Thoracic Anaesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. Part 1. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy. 2017;49(1). APA Kucewicz-Czech, E., Krzych, Ł. J., & Ligowski, M. (2017). Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery — a position statement from the Cardiac and Thoracic Anaesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. Part 1. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 49(1). Chicago Kucewicz-Czech, Ewa, Łukasz J Krzych, and Marcin Ligowski. 2017. "Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery — a position statement from the Cardiac and Thoracic Anaesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. Part 1". Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 49 (1). Harvard Kucewicz-Czech, E., Krzych, Ł., and Ligowski, M. (2017). Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery — a position statement from the Cardiac and Thoracic Anaesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. Part 1. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 49(1). MLA Kucewicz-Czech, Ewa et al. "Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery — a position statement from the Cardiac and Thoracic Anaesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. Part 1." Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, vol. 49, no. 1, 2017. Vancouver Kucewicz-Czech E, Krzych Ł, Ligowski M. Perioperative haemodynamic optimisation in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery — a position statement from the Cardiac and Thoracic Anaesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. Part 1. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy. 2017;49(1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it