MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917631385

Having Non-State Torture Recognized by the UN and Member States as an Infringement of Women's Human Rights Is Imperative

2018· article· en· W2917631385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeanne Sarson, Linda MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTorture, Ethics, and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortureHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologyArtSociologyHuman rightsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WARNING: The content and images featured in this article are explicit and may be disturbing to some readers. Cet article decrit l’impact «classique» de la victimisation suite a la torture infligee a l’exterieur des Nations. Les auteures mettent en relation leurs connaissances et leur contact avec des femmes qui denoncent par le biais de leur art ce qu’elles ont vecu et les effets sur leur vie : des dessins, un tableau, une photo. Les femmes sont affectees hors de proportion par ces crimes qui ne sont meme pas reconnus par la societe et la justice. Cette torture doit etre reconnue comme une forme specifique de violence interpersonnelle dans les codes criminels de l’Etat alors que les Nations Unis sont outillees pour proteger les droits des femmes qui ne peuvent etre jugees, ne peuvent recevoir de l’aide pour une rehabilitation que les auteures jugent realisable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicTorture, Ethics, and LawFrench-language works237,207