MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917659894 · doi:10.1109/isspit.2018.8642636

Combined Fusion Schemes for Cluster-Based Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks

2018· article· en· W2917659894 on OpenAlexaff
Noor Salout, Faroq Awin, Esam Abdel‐Raheem, Kemal Tepe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Scheme (mathematics)FadingSpectrum (functional analysis)Fusion centerCluster (spacecraft)Fusion rulesSensor fusionComputer networkArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsWirelessMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Image fusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work proposes two algorithms to combine two different fusion schemes for cluster-based spectrum sensing (CBSS) in cognitive radio networks (CRNs). The two proposed schemes employ the principle of Neyman-Pearson to enhance the detection performance while maintains the spectrum efficiency at a predefined target. Moreover, the simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed scheme compared with the existing works under different fading channels as it improves the detection and reduces the reporting overhead as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207