MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917671514

México: todo un Museo de Política de Drogas

2018· article· en· W2917671514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotographic and Visual Arts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaDrug traffickingPolitical sciencePublic policyArtSociologyHistoryLawVisual artsCriminology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Museum of Drug Policy in Mexico City was the reproduction of the pop up museum that was previously exhibited in London, Montreal and New York. The event was organized by non profit organizations committed to expose the humanitarian drama that the war on drugs has meant.The museum achieved its goal of raising awareness through art exhibited in 8 rooms with 80 pieces made by 26 artists, along with conferences and public conversations that opened a dialogue, which highlighted the social consequences of prohibitionist drug policy. In one weekend, the museum managed to connect attendees with each other, with others and with the harsh reality of a failed drug policy that must be transformed to alleviate the suffering of patients, users, victims, and society as a whole that pays the violent consequences of the meaningless combat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it