MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917832396 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11509

Energy Optimization for Virtualized Network Environments

2016· dissertation· en· W2917832396 on OpenAlexaff
Ebrahim Ghazisaeedi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionDistributed computingEfficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)Control reconfigurationNetwork virtualizationVirtualizationService providerData centerComputer networkService (business)Embedded systemCloud computingEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has been estimated to consume 10% of the total energy consumption in industrial countries. According to the latest measurements, this amount is rapidly increasing by 6% annually. With the evolved new business model in which Service Providers (SPs) are separated from Infrastructure Providers (InPs), Virtualized Network Environments (VNEs) have been regarded as a promising technology for flexibly utilizing shared communication network resources. VNEs also play a fundamental role toward virtualizing data centers. In this thesis, we suggest different feasible solutions to optimize the energy consumption in a VNE. In this regard, first, we review the corresponding literature in regard to the architecture of a VNE, its performance modelling, several power models, and also existing energy-saving solutions for VNEs. We approach the objective of optimizing the energy consumption in a VNE by defining and solving two main problems. The first problem optimizes the energy consumption in a VNE during the off-peak period. This is feasible by reconfiguring the mapping of already embedded virtual networks for the off-peak time. This is planned in two smaller and simpler sub-problems with increasing the complexity and higher energy-saving levels. Our solutions enable the providers to adjust the level of the reconfiguration and accordingly control the possible traffic disruptions. In the second problem, we propose a novel energy-efficient embedding method that maps heterogeneous MapReduce-based virtual networks onto a heterogeneous data center physical network, energy-wise. We introduce a new incast problem that specifically may happen in Virtualized Data Centers (VDCs). The proposed embedding process also controls the incast queueing delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207