MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2917956926 · doi:10.7202/1054113ar

Les changements climatiques attendus et leurs impacts potentiels sur l’écologie routière au Québec

2018· article· fr· W2917956926 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Valérie Bourduas Crouhen, Robert Siron, Hélène Côté, Travis Logan, Isabelle Charron

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsForestryPolitical scienceHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les changements climatiques auront des répercussions importantes sur l’écologie routière au Québec (Canada). L’augmentation de la température, des précipitations, des périodes de gel et de dégel ainsi que la diminution du couvert de neige sont susceptibles d’engendrer des cascades d’événements sur le système routier et les écosystèmes environnants. L’objectif de cet article est de présenter un portrait de la littérature disponible afin d’illustrer ces changements au Québec, leurs impacts potentiels ainsi que les mesures d’adaptation possibles. Parmi les impacts potentiels des changements climatiques, on compte la prolifération d’espèces exotiques envahissantes en bordure des routes, la fragmentation des habitats ou, encore, une accélération de la dégradation des routes en raison du dégel du pergélisol. La façon de planifier, de concevoir, de construire et d’entretenir le réseau routier, y compris les écosystèmes qui l’entourent, doit donc tenir compte dès à présent de ces impacts potentiels. Cela nécessite de s’appuyer sur les observations du climat passé et sur les projections du climat futur. Une prise de décision éclairée et intégrée est primordiale afin de s’adapter aux conséquences graves des changements climatiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Naturaliste canadienSame topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207