MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918010644 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2019.2895652

High-DR CMOS Fluorescence Biosensor With Extended Counting ADC and Noise Cancellation

2019· article· en· W2918010644 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehdi Noormohammadi Khiarak, Sylvain Martel, Yves De Koninck, Benoit Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCMOSDynamic rangeCorrelated double samplingBiosensorNoise (video)Wide dynamic rangePhotodiodePhysicsComputer scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsArtificial intelligenceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately resolving small fluorescence power variations in presence of noise and high-background tissue autofluorescence from deep brain structures with a fiber photometry system requires highly linear and sensitive photo detectors. This paper presents a high-dynamic range (DR) CMOS biosensor fusing a low-noise photosensing front-end with a high-precision extended counting analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with noise cancellation to detect florescence neural signal fluctuations of very low incident power. The 7 MSBs are resolved by a first order continuous-time resettable ΣΔ ADC, whereas the residue voltage is quantized by a 10-bit single slope ADC for enabling wide-dynamic range and high-precision fluorescence sensing. The reset noise is canceled out by an embedded noise cancellation scheme which is subtracting the reset noise from the signal using a correlated double sampling scheme. Unlike other solutions, the biosensor has a short conversion time of 306.5 μs compared to a typical fluoresence sampling period of 10 ms, providing a very low duty cyle of 3%, which is a key to achieve low excitation source power consumption in this application to extend system autonomy, and to avoid photobleaching and phototoxicity in the tissue. The proposed optoelectronic biosensor is implemented in a 0.18-μm CMOS technology, consuming 93 μW from a 3.3-V supply voltage while achieving a DR of 104 dB, a minimum detectable current of 1.3 pArms, and a chip area of 0.475 mm2. We present the measured performance of the biosensor using an optical experimental setup including a LED driver, a fiber optic, and a test board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207