MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Which tests are most useful in distinguishing between reactive thrombocytosis and the thrombocytosis of myeloproliferative disease?

2008· article· en· W2918078902 on OpenAlexaff
R V Majer, A. DAWE, Pauline Weir, A. JONES-LECOINTE, P.J. GREEN

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Laboratory Haematology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood properties and coagulation
Canadian institutionsSt Mary's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrombocytosisPlateletFibrinogenMedicinePolycythemia veraMyeloproliferative DisordersInternal medicineVon Willebrand factorGastroenterologyPathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an attempt to distinguish between thrombocytosis in myeloproliferative disease (MPD) and reactive thrombocytosis (RT) the following aspects of platelet structure and function were evaluated: platelet size, platelet aggregation and adhesion, dense granule and alpha granule components. In addition plasma fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor antigen (vWFag) were measured. In all parameters measured there was a significant difference between normals and both categories of thrombocytosis, however there was considerable overlap between MPD and RT. Plasma fibrinogen emerged as the best single test to discriminate between MPD and RT, levels of less than 5.0 g/l indicating MPD and greater than 5.0 g/l indicating RT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical & Laboratory HaematologySame topicBlood properties and coagulationFrench-language works237,207