MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918149247 · doi:10.1109/isspit.2018.8642620

Extraction of Fetal Electrocardiogram signals using Blind Source Extraction Based Parallel Linear Predictor Filter

2018· article· en· W2918149247 on OpenAlexaff
Luay Yassin Taha, Esam Abdel‐Raheem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFastICAComputer scienceBlind signal separationPattern recognition (psychology)Independent component analysisArtificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Extraction (chemistry)Sensitivity (control systems)Linear predictionAlgorithmEngineeringElectronic engineeringChemistryComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to apply the blind source extraction (BSE) parallel linear predictor filter (PLP) algorithm to extract Fetal Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. First, the ECG signals are modelled using the linear mixture model. Then, the BSE-PLP algorithm is applied to extract both the maternal and fetal ECG signals. Simulation results show that the model is successfully extracting all the unknown FECG and MECG signals, for both synthesized and real ECG data. The algorithm is also tested using the sensitivity and accuracy R-peak extraction metrics. The recorded values for the two metrics are 95.652% and 91.667%, respectively, and show considerable improvements as compared to PCA, FastICA and SOBI algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207