MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918191684 · doi:10.3968/8583

The Discussion of the B603 Block's Supplement Development SchemeThe Discussion of the B603 Block’s Supplement Development Scheme

2016· article· en· W2918191684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Chen, Li Ding, Xiaoqing Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiltstoneLithologyBlock (permutation group theory)GeologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringPlan (archaeology)Mining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeochemistryGeomorphologyPaleontologyMathematicsFaciesChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To B603 block, the main strata is Guantao group of four sand groups, the reservoir buried deep is 1,004-1,067 m, reservoir lithology is mainly siltstone, reservoir belongs to high porosity and high permeability, and reservoir type is mainly structural lithological reservoir. According to the design of the previous adjustment plan, four wells were drilled in 2010. In order to further improve the producing degree of reserves and recovery factor, the previous adjustment plan was improved. North District, where well control is poor, continued to be expanded to improve the producing degree. And southern district continued to improve well network and enhance ultimate recovery factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207