MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2918239616 · doi:10.4095/313664

SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the South Mountain Batholith, Nova Scotia: timing and duration of crystallization and evidence for inheritance

2019· report· en· W2918239616 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luke Bickerton, Daniel J. Kontak, Iain M. Samson, J. B. Murphy, Dawn A. Kellett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconNova scotiaShrimpBatholithNova (rocket)Inheritance (genetic algorithm)GeologyGeographyGeochemistryArchaeologyFisheryPaleontologyBiologyEngineeringGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The South Mountain Batholith (SMB) is the largest (7300 km2) granitoid body in the Appalachian Orogen. It is a composite peraluminous intrusion with early stage biotite-granodiorite to biotite-monzogranite and later leucomonzogranite to leucogranite plutons. The latter are associated with subeconomic to economic polymetallic mineral deposits, including the past-producing (1985-1992) East Kemptville Sn-Cu-Zn-Ag(-In) deposit. Sensitive High-Resolution Ion Microprobe (SHRIMP) analyses of zircon were used to constrain the timing of emplacement for phases across the SMB and to investigate potential sources of contamination to the magma. Zircon from four granodiorite to monzogranite samples and one from a more evolved leucogranite were analyzed to complement our previous SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the more evolved phases (ca. 377-370 Ma). The granodiorite samples yielded ages between 384.9 ± 4.4 Ma and 375.9 ± 4.5 Ma whereas the leucogranite yielded an age of 377.7 ± 5.2 Ma (2? errors). A late monzogranitic phase on the edge of the SMB also yielded an age of 367.7 ± 4.0 Ma. Collectively, the data sets indicate an apparent span of ca. 11 to 23 Ma for emplacement and assembly of the SMB, but with most ages between ca. 378 to 370 Ma. The abundance of xenocrystic zircon cores varies throughout the complex; from common in less evolved granodiorite samples to rare in the more evolved leucogranite samples. The relative age population density pattern for the inherited cores is very similar to the detrital zircon signature for the upper stratigraphy of the Meguma Supergroup that hosts the SMB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→