MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918367616 · doi:10.7202/1056305ar

Technologies numériques et transformations des industries : considération des effets de la numérisation du service des transports publics individualisés en France

2019· article· fr· W2918367616 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roger Thierry Malack

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSharing Economy and Platforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPublicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En France, la transformation des transports publics particuliers de personnes (T3P) s’accompagne de l’apparition des plateformes numériques, autour desquelles se développent de nouveaux services de mobilité. L’expansion de ces nouveaux acteurs et les spécificités de leur modèle économique sont à l’origine de nombreuses transformations. Elles éprouvent les fondements traditionnels de l’économie des activités concernées, la structure de l’industrie et celle du marché. Les dysfonctionnements inhérents à ces évolutions ont des répercussions sur les conditions socio-économiques des chauffeurs et sur l’agencement des métiers. Cet article appréhende les effets de la numérisation des services dans le secteur des transports individualisés. Il montre comment l’agrégation des ressources technologiques et les transformations de l’environnement politique et économique contribuent à l’émergence d’un nouvel ordre dans lequel se déploient des pratiques commerciales qui affectent la structure des métiers, les relations d’emploi et les conditions de travail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicSharing Economy and PlatformsFrench-language works237,207