Le world café comme outil de mobilisation pour la sensibilisation à la maltraitance envers les proches aidants à Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La provenance de la maltraitance envers les aînés est le plus souvent attribuée à leur entourage et expliquée par le stress de l’aidant ou les relations antérieures conflictuelles ou abusives. Cet article vise à mettre en lumière une problématique sociale méconnue : la maltraitance envers les proches aidants. Nous exposons la démarche et les résultats d’un « world café » organisé à Québec pour en discuter. Cet exercice de consultation collective suscite quelques pistes de réflexion. D’abord, l’impossibilité de dissocier la maltraitance envers les aidants de celle des aînés, tout en soulignant l’importance de lui réserver un traitement différencié. Aussi, l’absence d’évaluation de leurs besoins par les intervenants, dont les travailleurs sociaux, ainsi que le manque de reconnaissance et de soutien des aidants de la part de l’État comme facteurs de développement d’un terreau fertile à la maltraitance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".