In situ stress states and lateral deformations of soil–bentonite cutoff walls during consolidation process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A long-term in situ test was performed on two soil–bentonite (SB) cutoff walls with different dimensions. The total stresses and pore pressures in the walls were monitored for 8 months, and the lateral wall deformations were monitored for 15 months. The monitoring results revealed that the primary consolidation of the presented SB cutoff walls took approximately 8 months. In the first 5 days, the stress states of the walls were nearly isotropic. The total stresses were less than the geostatic stress, and the lateral wall deformations were negligible. As the consolidation developed, the total horizontal stresses in the walls decreased and then remained unchanged at most depths after 1 month, while the stresses at the bottoms continued decreasing. The nonlinear profiles of the horizontal effective stresses in the cutoff walls were similar to the active earth pressure distributions behind the retaining walls moving in translation mode. The trench sidewall movements were found in translation mode within a specific depth range. Obvious dependencies of the horizontal effective stress and the horizontal strain on the wall height were observed. Comparison with the literature illustrates the influence of backfill properties on the consolidation behavior of the SB cutoff walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".