The phytophagous and predatory mites (Acari) on Prunus (Rosaceae) in southeastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During summer 2015, 192 samples of foliage were taken from 13 different Prunus species found mostly along the Ottawa River (Quebec, Ontario; 148 samples) and in the Vineland region (Ontario; 44 samples). A total of 39 mites species were collected. Estimators of the true species diversity indicated that most of the mite fauna in the areas sampled was captured. One eriophyid mite species appears to represent a new species for science. In terms of host range, phytoseiids appear to be less specific than eriophyoids and both taxa can exhibit host preferences. In addition to providing an overview of the mite fauna of Prunus foliage and galls, this project provides two identification keys to the eriophyid mite species associated with galls, one based on the mite morphology, and the other based on the morphology of the galls.Keywords:Prunus; phytophagous mites; predatory mites; survey; biodiversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".