MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918767021 · doi:10.1111/jpm.12515

Filters in the coping process of people with schizophrenia: A constructivist grounded theory study

2019· article· en· W2918767021 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie‐Claude Jacques, Denise St‐Cyr Tribble, Jean‐Pierre Bonin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalInstitut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux
FundersCanadian Nurses FoundationDesjardins Foundation
KeywordsCoping (psychology)Grounded theoryPsychologyPsychological interventionPsychotherapistQualitative researchClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: In the nursing perspective of Roy's adaptation model, to be adapted means to have positive interactions with one's environment. The ability to use effective coping strategies is an essential ingredient of mental health recovery. However, coping difficulties are often a problem for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder, especially those who have inadequate social support. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: "Filters in the coping process" is a grounded theory of coping in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder. A filter effect impairs their ability and limits their opportunities to use effective coping strategies. These filters are as follows: to have been helped, to understand in one's own way, to act despite limited freedom and to modulate the process of self-disclosure. "Surface coping" is the product of the effect of these filters on coping attempts and possibilities. It does not reflect the person's real potential. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: By offering an alternative, holistic nursing perspective, the filter model provides the nurse with factors to consider when assessing clients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder, so as to plan interventions towards improving their coping capacity. By allowing for the presence of surface coping, the nurse will have less tendency to form negative judgments about clients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder. ABSTRACT: Introduction Numerous studies confirm the coping difficulties of people diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, especially those with limited social support. Further, the coping process is itself poorly understood. Aim Starting from a conceptualization of the adaptation of Roy's model, the aim of this study was to describe the coping process of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder in the context of an inadequate social support. Method A constructivist grounded theorization was performed with a sample of 30 persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Results The results are a model named: "Filters in the coping process of people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder who have inadequate social support." The type of coping strategies used evolves over time and in accordance with the filters. The consequence of the process is "surface coping." Discussion The coping potential of people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder is affected by environmental factors as well as factors inherent to the disorder itself. The filter model provides a holistic perspective, as opposed to merely focusing on behaviours. Implication for practice The findings of this study could improve nursing interventions through a better understanding of impediments to coping: what they are, how they arise and the nature of their effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health NursingSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207