MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918796427 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2018-0221

Optimization of high-speed turning parameters for Inconel 713C based on Taguchi grey relational analysis

2019· article· en· W2918796427 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V Parthiban, S. Vijayakumar, M. Sakthivel

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetal Alloys Wear and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaguchi methodsGrey relational analysisInconelOrthogonal arrayMaterials scienceSurface roughnessMachiningMechanical engineeringAlloyComputer scienceMetallurgyComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a propelled dynamic approach, Taguchi grey relational analysis has been employed to estimate the impact of untreated and cryogenically treated and oil-quenched WC-Co tools in high-speed turning of Inconel 713C alloy on cutting force and surface roughness. Taguchi grey relational analysis is executed to maximize the high-speed turning of Inconel 713C alloy taking into account various operating parameters (cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut). The L27 orthogonal array has been utilized to determine the signal-to-noise ratio. Analysis of variance was performed to recognize the large number of components influencing surface roughness. The numerical examination showed that feed rate, with percentages as high as 95%, had the most predominant impact on machining performance, followed by cutting speed for untreated and treated WC-Co tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicMetal Alloys Wear and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207