MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2918811879 · doi:10.4095/313640

Lithological and structural setting of structurally controlled gold mineralization in the Wilding Lake region, central Newfoundland

2019· report· en· W2918811879 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ian W. Honsberger, Wouter Bleeker, H A Sandeman, D T W Evans

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralization (soil science)GeologyGeochemistryArchaeologyGeographySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structurally controlled central Newfoundland gold belt is emerging as one of the next significant mining jurisdictions in Canada. Gold mineralization is associated with crustal-scale faults that preserve synorogenic conglomerates, similar to the setting of orogenic gold in the Archean Abitibi greenstone belt. Recent exploration in the Wilding Lake region exposed a system of auriferous quartz veins hosted within sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Detailed lithological and structural documentation of these newly exposed zones was conducted to examine controls on gold mineralization and place the vein system into a regional context. Field data demonstrate that the main 'Elm' quartz vein extends for approximately 230 m along strike, is up to 2 m wide and cuts the conglomerate host within an oblique sinistral shear zone that accommodated north-northeast-directed thrusting. An early set of moderately dipping extensional quartz veins, consistent with oblique sinistral shear, emanate from the main vein. A later, more steeply dipping set of extensional quartz veins crosscut the main vein and the earlier vein set, and are consistent with a component of horizontal extension. Chalcopyrite and malachite occur locally in the early vein set, but are more abundant overall within the younger vein set. A nearly conjugate set of steeply dipping extension fractures crosscut the main vein and the two vein sets. These fractures are filled typically with vuggy quartz and unaltered and altered sulphides. Field data are consistent with progressive deformation characterized by early oblique compressional sinistral shear and subsequent components of subhorizontal extension and minor dextral strike-slip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→