MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918824169 · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.02.002

Gaceta Sanitaria en 2018. Fortalecimiento de la presencia en Latinoamérica y promoción de la publicación de temas esenciales para el Sistema Nacional de Salud

2019· editorial· es· W2918824169 on OpenAlexaff
Clara Bermúdez‐Tamayo, Miguel Negrín Hernández, Juan Alguacil, Erica Briones‐Vozmediano, David Cantarero, Mercedes Carrasco‐Portiño, Gonzalo Casino, Enrique Castro‐Sánchez, María del Mar García‐Calvente, Laura González, David Epstein, Mariano Hernán, Leila Posenato García, María Teresa Ruiz‐Cantero, Andreu Segura, Marı́a Victoria Zunzunegui, Lucero Juárez, Blanca Lumbreras, Carlos Álvarez‐Dardet

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta Sanitaria · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Una vez más, presentamos el informe de la actividad realizada por el equipo editorial a lo largo del año anterior y los datos de desempeño de la revista, con el fin de rendir cuentas a nuestros/as lectores/as, a las personas socias de SESPAS y a la sociedad. El documento permite analizar los avances y las áreas de mejora de la revista, así como los logros alcanzados más relevantes. Este año queremos destacar el fortalecimiento de la presencia en Latinoamérica y la promoción de la publicación de temas esenciales para el Sistema Nacional de Salud

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta SanitariaSame topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207