MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918896713 · doi:10.1249/fit.0000000000000466

MIGHT PLIGHT: THE SOCIAL ANXIETY FELT BY MEN IN THE WEIGHTLIFTING ENVIRONMENT

2019· article· en· W2918896713 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Cyr, Krista J. Munroe‐Chandler, Kimberley L. Gammage

Bibliographic record

VenueACSMʼs Health & Fitness Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyFeelingPsychologySpace (punctuation)Physical fitnessSocial psychologyApplied psychologyMedicineComputer sciencePhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apply It! Be aware of the specific elements and scenarios in your fitness facility that may elicit anxiety in men and work to improve the environment to eliminate or alleviate those feelings of anxiety. Be especially aware of these scenarios in gyms where there might be a number of clients who are bodybuilders. Consider the development of all-male fitness classes to alleviate perceived anxiety and encourage physical activity in men. Consider the physical space and the addition of equipment in your fitness facility to eliminate conflicts over resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACSMʼs Health & Fitness JournalSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207