Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans Le Coq et l’Arlequin (1918), Cocteau est le porte-parole de Satie et des jeunes musiciens qui gravitent autour de lui. Une vingtaine d’aphorismes attaquent violemment la musique de Debussy, car Cocteau souhaite voir émerger une musique française débarrassée des caractéristiques de la musique impressionniste. Par la suite, ses écrits abordent encore Debussy à plusieurs reprises, dans une bonne vingtaine d’articles divers. Jusque vers 1940, il justifie ces positions de jeunesse ; il tente de se dédommager en tentant d’expliquer que c’était là une attitude de jeunes en rébellion contre leurs aînés. Par la suite, Cocteau sera de plus en plus nuancé ; il ne se justifiera plus, mais affirmera son admiration pour Debussy et son chef-d’oeuvre, Pelléas et Mélisande, dont il conçoit même les décors et les costumes lors d’une production au Théâtre municipal de Metz en 1962.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".