MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2918989581 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23490

Effect of bed geometry on operating pressure drop and minimum fluidizing velocity in a draft tube spout‐fluid bed

2019· article· en· W2918989581 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tingting Zhang, Guoqiang Huang, Guoliang Su, Shuaifeng Liu, Yeming Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPressure dropFluidized bedDraft tubeMechanicsFluidizationTube (container)Superficial velocityChemistryMaterials scienceThermodynamicsFlow (mathematics)Composite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Operating pressure drop and minimum fluidizing velocity were studied in a flat spout‐fluid bed using sub‐millimetre grade silicon particles. The influence of introducing a nonporous draft tube of different configurations as well as fluidizing gas on the two parameters was investigated. A comparison of fluidizing gas systems indicated that introduced gas restrained gas bypassing to lower the minimum fluidizing velocity; however, the operating pressure drop was higher than systems without the existence of fluidizing gas. Two new correlations that took into account the effects of bed geometry and fluidizing gas on the operating pressure drop and minimum fluidizing velocity were developed based on the experimental data, which were in agreement with the present experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207