MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919005898 · doi:10.4000/books.demopolis.1032

La mémoire et le temps

2018· book· fr· W2919005898 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quand Marcel Mauss entrait dans la lumière, son alter ego Henri Hubert (1872-1927) se retirait dans l'ombre. Les deux amis s'étaient pourtant promis de refonder ensemble l'étude des sociétés et des cultures : à Mauss les organisations et les pratiques sociales actuelles, et à Hubert celles du passé, dont témoignent l'histoire et l'archéologie. Ou encore : à Mauss l'espace, et à Hubert le temps. Mort trop jeune, Henri Hubert est l'un des derniers savants à avoir exploré plusieurs disciplines à la fois. Historien des religions, il a été également sociologue, au sein de l'équipe d'Émile Durkheim, mais aussi archéologue et muséographe, auprès de Salomon Reinach au musée des Antiquités nationales de Saint-Germain-en-Laye. Les meilleurs spécialistes des travaux d'Henri Hubert ont été réunis dans cet ouvrage, pour proposer pour la première fois une vision d'ensemble de l'œuvre transdisciplinaire de ce « jumeau de travail » de Mauss. Car, dans les différents champs qu'il a explorés, Hubert a développé une approche profondément nouvelle du temps social et culturel : un temps « qualitatif » qui est celui de la mémoire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207