Learning Raw Image Reconstruction-Aware Deep Image Compressors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning-based image compressors are actively being explored in an effort to supersede conventional image compression algorithms, such as JPEG. Conventional and deep learning-based compression algorithms focus on minimizing image fidelity errors in the nonlinear standard RGB (sRGB) color space. However, for many computer vision tasks, the sensor's linear raw-RGB image is desirable. Recent work has shown that the original raw-RGB image can be reconstructed using only small amounts of metadata embedded inside the JPEG image [1]. However, [1] relied on the conventional JPEG encoding that is unaware of the raw-RGB reconstruction task. In this paper, we examine the ability of deep image compressors to be "aware" of the additional objective of raw reconstruction. Towards this goal, we describe a general framework that enables deep networks targeting image compression to jointly consider both image fidelity errors and raw reconstruction errors. We describe this approach in two scenarios: (1) the network is trained from scratch using our proposed joint loss, and (2) a network originally trained only for sRGB fidelity loss is later fine-tuned to incorporate our raw reconstruction loss. When compared to sRGB fidelity-only compression, our combined loss leads to appreciable improvements in PSNR of the raw reconstruction with only minor impact on sRGB fidelity as measured by MS-SSIM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".