Dupilumab for Systemic Allergy Syndrome With Dermatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has been traditionally identified as TH1-mediated delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. There is currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved systemic therapy indicated for ACD. Among patients with ACD, there is a subgroup that experience not only concomitant atopic dermatitis and ACD but also systemic allergic dermatitis driven by allergens encountered through dietary consumption. Basic science and clinical studies have supported the notion that ACD involves a complex interaction between both TH1 and TH2 axes of the secondary immune system on an allergen-by-allergen basis. Herein, we report the patients with systemic allergy syndrome with dermatitis to either Balsam of Peru or nickel who achieved remarkable improvement and regained their quality of life without continuing adherence to strict diets. Our study suggests that dupilumab may be an efficacious solution for a particular subgroup of patients with recalcitrant ACD when first- and second-line therapies have failed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".