Melatonin and oral squamous cell carcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of worldwide ranking, oral cancer is the eighth most prevalent cancer. Oral squamous cell carcinoma is a cancer that occurs following dysplasia of the mucosa of the oral cavity and oropharynx. There are different inflammatory pathways involved in the pathophysiology of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), a well documented anticancer agent, exhibits numerous functions including induction of apoptotic pathways and controlling of oxidative stress. In the in vivo and in vitro studies the results have demonstrated that melatonin supplementation is an appropriate therapeutic approach for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Melatonin might inhibit cancer cells through the regulation of molecular pathways including AKT/mTOR pathway, ERK/AKT signaling, LSD1 expression and tumor-associated neutrophils releasing. Limited clinical studies; however, have evaluated the role of melatonin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. This review summarizes current knowledge and evidence regarding the effects of melatonin on oral squamous cell carcinoma and the mechanisms involved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".