MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Formalidades del matrimonio en el código general del proceso

2013· article· es· W2919420367 on OpenAlexaff
Alcides Morales Acacio

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Jurídica Mario Alario D´Filippo · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily and Matrimonial Law
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En esta investigación se apreciarán las distintas normativas existentes para la celebración del matrimonio, a partir de la entrada en vigencia del Código General del Proceso, en las cuales quedaron derogados algunos artículos del Código de Procedimiento Civil. Por ello, es perentorio realizar un análisis holístico y jurídico del contrato sinalagmático del matrimonio en el nuevo Código General del Proceso para verificar su validez jurídica, con el propósito de identificar las nuevas formalidades existentes y su apoyo legal. Se encontrarán en la investigación todos los cambios introducidos por el legislador, encaminados a brindar eficacia procesal a este contrato.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.038
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Jurídica Mario Alario D´FilippoSame topicFamily and Matrimonial LawFrench-language works237,207