MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2919459026 · doi:10.1063/1.5054897

Representation of surfaces using spinor operators

2019· article· en· W2919459026 on OpenAlexaff
Jayme Vaz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsSpinorDirac operatorOperator (biology)Representation (politics)MathematicsDirac equationGeneralizationSurface (topology)Algebra over a fieldQuaternionic representationClifford analysisPure mathematicsMathematical physicsReal representationMathematical analysisGeometryIrreducible representation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use the concept of spinor operator to study some aspects of the classical theory of surfaces in three dimensions. We show that a spinor operator representing a surface satisfies a pair of Dirac-like equations and that this spinor operator representation is a generalization of the Weierstrass representation of minimal surfaces. We also obtain spinor operator representations of a surface directly from its parameterization in terms of isothermal parameters, without the need of solving the pair of Dirac-like equations. We apply these results to minimal surfaces and their deformations and also show how they can be written in terms of quaternions and complex numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAlgebraic and Geometric AnalysisFrench-language works237,207