Fractional-order sliding mode control for deployment of tethered spacecraft system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a fractional-order integral sliding mode control with the order 0 < ν < 1 to stabilize the deployment of tethered spacecraft system with only tension regulation. The work in this paper is partially based on integer-order nonlinear sliding mode controller and improves its performance with fractional-order calculus. The proposed scheme makes use of integral sliding surface to obtain smaller convergence regions of state errors, and the fractional derivative is synthesized to enhance the flexibility of controller design by fining parameters for better dynamic and steady-state performance. Fractional-order observers help to eliminate external disturbances while the adaptive law is presented to remove the adverse effect in stability analyses, and fractional-order uniform ultimate boundedness is proved to guarantee the existence of the proposed sliding surface. According to theoretical analyses, the fractional order will indeed affect the dynamic and steady-state performance of control system, and the proposed method will be verified in numerical simulations compared with the nonlinear sliding mode counterpart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it