<i>EWSR1‐PBX3</i> gene fusion in cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cutaneous syncytial myoepithelioma (CSM) is a recently recognized, histopathological variant of myoepithelial (ME) tumors of the skin. It is characterized by a syncytial arrangement of spindled, ovoid, and/or epithelioid cells forming a well-circumscribed, unencapsulated dermal nodule. There is a paucity of intervening stroma, and absent duct or gland formation. Strong immunohistochemical staining for S100 and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) has been described, while cytokeratin expression has been uncommon. The majority of CSMs harbor a rearrangement involving the EWSR1 gene. Although various fusion partner genes have been discovered in ME tumors at other anatomic sites, none has yet been described in CSM. We present a case of CSM represented clinically by a papule on the mid-upper back of a healthy 44-year-old female. It exhibited morphological and immunohistochemical features of a CSM with strong, diffuse S100 and alpha-actin expression, and focal positivity for EMA and cytokeratin AE1/AE3. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization showed an EWSR1 gene rearrangement. Massively parallel next-generation RNA sequencing revealed PBX3 as the fusion partner. The EWSR1-PBX3 gene fusion has been previously identified in three cases of ME tumors of bone and soft tissue, and in a case of retroperitoneal leiomyoma. This is the first report of an EWSR1-PBX3 fusion in CSM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it