MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920004742 · doi:10.37676/jm.v6i1.504

GAMBARAN PENGETAHUAN DAN PARITAS IBU YANG MEMBERIKAN ASI EKSKLUSIF DI WILAYAH PUSKESMAS CAHAYA NEGERI KABUPATEN SELUMA TAHUN 2017

2018· article· en· W2920004742 on OpenAlexaff
Diyah Tepi Rahmawati, Taliah Taliah, Lucky Nelazyani, Afreliya Eka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of Midwifery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingToddlerMedicineCommunity health centerParity (physics)PediatricsPopulationDemographyFamily medicineEnvironmental healthPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decline in the rate of exclusive breastfeeding is one of the factors causing death in infants. Breast-fed infants are 17 times more likely to have pneumonia, and are 3-4 times more likely to get respiratory infection than infants exclusively breastfed (Maryunami, 2012).This study aimed to determine the description of knowledge and parity of mothers providing exclusive ation at Cahaya Negeri health center of Seluma regency in 2017.The type of research is descriptive quantitative with the entire population of Mothers having infants aged 6-12 months at Cahaya Negri health center area as many as 193 babies. This research was conducted on June 18 to July 25, 2017 with the Accidental Sampling by 66 respondents. This research used a descriptive analysis.The results obtained from 24 mothers who gave exclusive breastfeeding, (54.2%) were knowledgeable enough and (54.2%) mothers were with multiparity parity. Of the 42 mothers who did not breastfeed Exclusively (52.4%) had less knowledge and most (59.5%) of the mothers were with primiparity parityTo Cahaya Negeri Seluma Health Center of Seluma regency is expected to cooperate with health institute to do giving information to the community, especially pregnant women and mothers who have a toddler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Of MidwiferySame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207