MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920087199 · doi:10.22108/jssr.2018.84036.0

پالینولوژی سازند دلیچای در برش چینهشناسی گویداغ، جنوبشرقی مراغه بر مبنای داینوفلاژلهها

2018· article· fa· W2920087199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
فرشته سجادی, سمیه درمنکی فراهانی, فیروزه هاشمی یزدی

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefa
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiozoneMathematicsPhysicsGeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The Dalichai Formation is represented by greenish-grey color shales, calcareous shales, marls, and richly ammonitiferous limestones (Steiger, 1966), being widely distributed in the Alborz Mountain, northern Iran. It disconformably overlies the dark, siliciclastic coal bearing Shemshak Formation and underlies gradually by the light colored, more uniform Lar Limestone containing chert concretions. The Dalichai Formation is represented the first rock unit of the Jurassic marine sediments of the Alborz Mountain. This Formation includes a diverse fauna as ammonites, belemnites, bivalves, brachiopods, echinoderms, sponges, bryozoans and foraminifera (Stöcklin 1972; Sussli 1976; Nabavi & Seyed-Emami 1977; Alavi-Naini et al. 1982; Schairer et al. 1991; Seyed-Emami et al. 1985, 1989, 1995, 1996; Shafeizad et al. 2002; Shafeizad and Seyed- Emami 2005; Alvani 2006; , Niknahad 2007; Shahrabi 1994; Vaziri et al. 2008, 2011; Shams 2007; Makvandi 2000; Tutunchi 2001). Due to presence of shale and marl layers, this formation has been the subject of many palynological studies. (such as Wheeler & Sarjeant 1990; Ghasemi-Nejad et al. 2012; Mafi et al. 2013; Dehbozorgi et al. 2013; Hashemi-Yazdi et al. 2015; Skupien et al. 2015; Dehbozorgi 2013; Saadati Jafarabadi et al. 2013; Hashemi Yazdi 2008, 2015; Orak 2010; Sajjadi et al. 2009; Sabbaghiyan 2009; Ghasemi-Nejad et al. 2008; Boroumand et al. 2011, 2013; Farisi Kermani 2003; Ghasemi- Nejad & Khaki 2002; Navidi 2013). The purpose of this study was to determine the palaeoenvironmental interpretation of the Dalichai Formation based on inferred palaeoecological preferences of dinocyst types, and quantitative analysis of the palynofacies in the Dalichai Formation at the Guydagh section, southeastern Maragheh. Material and Methods Totally 23 palynologically possible samples collected from the Dalichai Formation at Guydagh section, southeastern Maragheh. All samples were prepared following standard palynological processing procedures (Phipps & Playford, 1984), including HCl (10-50%) and HF (40%) utilized for dissolution of carbonates and silicates, respectively. Then the residues were saturated with ZnCl2 solution (specific gravity 1.9 g/ml) for density separation. All the residues were sieved with a 20 μm mesh sieve previous to making strew slides. Three slides for each preparation were examined by transmitted light microscope. For quantitative study of the prepared slides, 15 field views were randomly selected from each slide and studied with a 16 - microscope magnification lens. The particles were counted for each sample to determine palynodebries and palynofacies. An analysis of facies including identification of palynomorphs, plant remains and amorphous particles, ratios of different particles, their size range in determination the paleoenvironment is highly important. Three main parameters including percentage of palynomorphs, phytoclasts, and organic matter (AOM) were transferred to Tyson triple diagram (Tyson 1993) for plotting and interpretations. Discussion of Results and Conclusions Diverse and moderately preserved palynofloras of marine and terrestrial derivation occur in surface samples of the Dalichai Formation Guydagh stratigraphic section in the southeast of Maragheh, western Alborz, northwestern Iran. In order to determine the age and reconstruct the paleoenvironment of the study section (including 198 meter of limestone, calcareous shale, marl and shale) was selected and examined palynologically. The palynofloras comprise dinoflagellate cysts, miospores (spores and pollen grain), acritarchs, scolecodonts, fungal and algal spores. The palynological investigations led to recognition of 85 species of dinocysts belong to 43 genera. Based on recorded dinocyst assemblages, especially marker species, three palynozone including Cribroperidinium crispum Total Range Zone (late Bajocian), Dichadogonyaulax sellwoodii Interval Zone (Bathonian – early Callovian) and Ctenidodinium continuum Interval Zone? (late Callovian) and one subzone (subzone "a" from early to middle Bathonian) were identified. The high similarity of western Alborz dinoflagellate assemblages with assemblages recorded from different parts of Iran (such as central and eastern part of Alborz and Binalud) and other parts of world (northwest of Europe, China, Qatar, Canada, Denmark, Egypt and etc.) proved presence of seaway connections between the mentioned basins through the late Bajocian - late Callovian. Also based on the palynofacies studies, four palynofacies of Tyson (1993) (II, IVa, VI, IX) were determined that proposed domination of a dysoxic shallow marine environment throughout the sedimentation of Dalichai Formation. Palynological evidence such as high frequency of proximate dinocysts to chorate forms; the high proportion of the equidimensional opaque palynomaceral to the blade-shape opaque palynomaceral; the high ratio of phytoclasts to marine palynomorphs, and the abundance of transparent amorphous organic matter in comparison to the opaque amorphous organic matter, all indicates that the Dalichai sediments, accumulated in a dysoxic shallow marine environment at the Guydagh section, southeastern Maragheh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMarine and environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207