MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920308520 · doi:10.1117/12.2512519

Theoretical feasibility of dual-energy functional x-ray imaging of respiratory disease

2019· article· en· W2920308520 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Tanguay, Miranda Kirby

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationImage resolutionPhysicsVentilation (architecture)Noise (video)ScatteringNuclear medicineMaterials scienceOpticsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced dual-energy (DE) approach for functional x-ray imaging of respiratory disease. With this approach, non-radioactive xenon is used to provide contrast between ventilated regions of the lung and unventilated regions of the lung (i.e. ventilation defects); DE subtraction is used to suppress rib structures from 2D thoracic images. We modeled theoretically the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a human observer for a defect present vs. defect absent binary classification task under signal-known-exactly/background-known-exactly conditions. Our model accounted for the size of ventilation defects, contrast of ventilation defects, quantum noise, finite spatial resolution, x-ray attenuation and observer efficiency. We modeled spherical defects with diameters up to 2.5 cm, and contrast and noise levels relevant for imaging of children, adolescents, adult males and adult females. Quantum noise and spatial resolution properties were calculated assuming an ideal energy-integrating x-ray detector. All calculations were performed assuming low-energy and high-energy applied tube voltages of 70 kV and 140 kV, respectively, with 2 mm of added copper filtration on the high-energy spectrum, and a total entrance exposure of 18 mR, which is typical for anterior-posterior thoracic imaging procedures. Our analysis shows that an AUC of 0.85 can be achieved for defect diameters as small as 1.1 cm, 1.2 cm, 1.3 cm and 1.4 cm for children ages 2 to 8, adolescents ages 9 to 14, adult males and adult females, respectively. Our results suggest that the DE approach proposed here warrants further investigation as a low-dose, low-cost alternative to existing approaches for functional imaging of respiratory disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical ImagingSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207