MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Is Not Affected by Exposure to Diesel Exhaust and Cycling Exercise in Individuals with Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

2018· article· en· W2920413981 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Koch, Christopher Carlsten, Jordan A. Guenette, Michael S. Koehle

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchoconstrictionMedicineInhalationSalbutamolPlaceboCrossover studyAsthmaAnesthesiaCyclingCOPDVital capacityBronchodilatorPhysical therapyInternal medicineLung functionLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of diesel exhaust (DE) exposure before and during cycling exercise in individuals with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) on lung function following the inhalation of a bronchodilating agent (salbutamol, SAL).METHODS: Seventeen 22-34 year-olds (9 females) with an EIB diagnosis were included in this double-blind randomized crossover study. In four exposure visits, participants performed a 30-minute cycling bout while breathing either DE or filtered air (FA) after the inhalation of either 400μg of SAL or placebo (PLA). After the inhalation of SAL or PLA, participants sat in the exposure chamber for 60 minutes. Following this rest period, participants cycled for 30 minutes at 50% of peak work rate achieved on their screening visit. During both the rest and cycling bouts, participants breathed either DE (PM2.5 = 300μg/m3) or FA. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was assessed at baseline, after the 60-minute resting period, immediately upon completion of the cycle bout, and 60 minutes after the completion of the exercise bout (~3 hours after IBA treatment). Participants were asked to withhold asthma medication 12 hours prior to testing.RESULTS: The inhalation of SAL led to a significant increase in FEV1 in the DE (baseline: 3.5±0.9L; 60 minutes following rest: 3.8±1.0L, p=0.04) and FA condition (baseline: 3.5±0.9L; 60min: following rest: 3.8±0.9L, p=0.02). Breathing DE at rest and during the cycle bout did not lead to changes in FEV1 (p= 0.67). After the inhalation of PLA, FEV1 averaged consistently at 3.5-3.6L (±0.9L) in the DE and FA conditions across all four measurement points (p > 0.05). The cycle exercise did not affect FEV1, meaning that participants neither experienced exercise-induced bronchoconstriction nor bronchodilation.CONCLUSIONS: The exposure to DE prior to and during a 30-minute cycle bout does not affect FEV1 in individuals with EIB following the inhalation of a bronchodilating agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207