MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Is Not Affected by Exposure to Diesel Exhaust and Cycling Exercise in Individuals with Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction

2018· article· en· W2920413981 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchoconstrictionMedicineInhalationSalbutamolPlaceboCrossover studyAsthmaAnesthesiaCyclingCOPDVital capacityBronchodilatorPhysical therapyInternal medicineLung functionLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of diesel exhaust (DE) exposure before and during cycling exercise in individuals with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) on lung function following the inhalation of a bronchodilating agent (salbutamol, SAL).METHODS: Seventeen 22-34 year-olds (9 females) with an EIB diagnosis were included in this double-blind randomized crossover study. In four exposure visits, participants performed a 30-minute cycling bout while breathing either DE or filtered air (FA) after the inhalation of either 400μg of SAL or placebo (PLA). After the inhalation of SAL or PLA, participants sat in the exposure chamber for 60 minutes. Following this rest period, participants cycled for 30 minutes at 50% of peak work rate achieved on their screening visit. During both the rest and cycling bouts, participants breathed either DE (PM2.5 = 300μg/m3) or FA. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was assessed at baseline, after the 60-minute resting period, immediately upon completion of the cycle bout, and 60 minutes after the completion of the exercise bout (~3 hours after IBA treatment). Participants were asked to withhold asthma medication 12 hours prior to testing.RESULTS: The inhalation of SAL led to a significant increase in FEV1 in the DE (baseline: 3.5±0.9L; 60 minutes following rest: 3.8±1.0L, p=0.04) and FA condition (baseline: 3.5±0.9L; 60min: following rest: 3.8±0.9L, p=0.02). Breathing DE at rest and during the cycle bout did not lead to changes in FEV1 (p= 0.67). After the inhalation of PLA, FEV1 averaged consistently at 3.5-3.6L (±0.9L) in the DE and FA conditions across all four measurement points (p > 0.05). The cycle exercise did not affect FEV1, meaning that participants neither experienced exercise-induced bronchoconstriction nor bronchodilation.CONCLUSIONS: The exposure to DE prior to and during a 30-minute cycle bout does not affect FEV1 in individuals with EIB following the inhalation of a bronchodilating agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it