MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920468273 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2902485

Cyber-Physical Predictive Energy Management for Through-the-Road Hybrid Vehicles

2019· article· en· W2920468273 on OpenAlexafffund
Hong Wang, Yanjun Huang, Amir Soltani, Amir Khajepour, Dongpu Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPowertrainEnergy managementModel predictive controlCyber-physical systemHybrid systemEnergy management systemComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Automotive engineeringController (irrigation)Hybrid vehicleEngineeringControl engineeringPower (physics)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceTorqueMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a Cyber-Physical System approach is proposed for the optimization of Through-The-Road (TTR) hybrid vehicles, in view of energy saving with a prior knowledge of road elevation. First, a hybrid powertrain for TTR vehicle is proposed for energy saving purposes and then the modeling of TTR hybrid vehicle is presented. Second, the proposed average power based model predictive controller (AP-MPC) is utilized to address the energy management problem for this TTR hybrid vehicle with only road elevation known as a priori obtained from the cyber word in Cyber-Physical System. A comparison study is proceeded to demonstrate the benefit of the hybrid powertrain compared to the traditional heavy commercial vehicle and the AP-MPC strategy compared with the prescient MPC and the rule-based energy management. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed AP-MPC without any priori velocity information can achieve an impressive improvement of 15.6% in three typical case studies even only with the road elevation information enabled by the cyber world in Cyber-Physical System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207