MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920471221 · doi:10.1111/hojo.12314

Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art (Routledge International Handbooks Series) J.I. Ross (Ed.). London and New York: Routledge (2016) 492pp. £185/$235 (print); £41.99/$57.95 (e‐book) ISBN 9781138792937 (print hb); ISBN 9781315761664 (e‐book)

2019· article· en· W2920471221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Konstantinos Avramidis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Howard Journal of Crime and Justice · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Spaces through Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraffitiMedia studiesSeries (stratigraphy)Art historyHistoryArtSociologyVisual artsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Routledge Handbook of Graffiti and Street Art, edited by criminologist, Jeffrey Ian Ross, is an important addition to the growing field of graffiti and street art studies. Published in 2016, that is, a few months after the release of two edited volumes on the same topic (Lovata and Olton 2015; Youkhana and Förster 2015) and a year before our collection from the same publisher (Avramidis and Tsilimpounidi 2017), the Handbook takes its position in graffiti literature in a moment of intense production on the subject. In this period of high scholarly interest in the topic, the volume does a great job in filling a gap in graffiti scholarship by offering a reader book that summarises and brings together the – often dispersed – research published up to the date of its release. Since the aspiration of the editor is to provide an extensive overview of the field – as expressed both in the foreword and introduction (pp.xxviii, 6) – the volume has definitely succeeded in achieving its goal. At the same time, the book makes a contribution to the legitimisation of graffiti and street art scholarship – an aim that is more clearly stated in a later article that the editor co-authored with some of the contributors of the collection (Ross et al. 2017) – while also serving as a handy teaching tool for courses in various disciplines in social sciences (Ross and Lennon 2018). The Handbook consists of a robust foreword written by founding graffiti scholar, Jeff Ferrell, an eloquent introduction by the editor, and 35 individual chapters authored by experts in the field. The book is organised in four parts, each of which opens with a short introduction by the editor, providing an overview of the chapters while identifying the omissions in the respective section. Part One has ten chapters focusing on the history, types and protagonists of graffiti and street art. In this section, examples of ancient (Baird and Taylor), hobo (Lennon), freight train (Weide), gang (Phillips), prison (Wilson), female (Pabón), latrine (Trahan), yarn (Haveri), legal (Kramer), and Indian (Martin), graffiti are presented, showing that all these writing forms – regardless of their historical, social, and material contexts – share something in common. In so doing, this part addresses issues of definitions while challenging the established histories regarding the origins of contemporary graffiti writing. At the same time, it paves the way for a creative exchange between seemingly distant research strands. The six chapters of Part Two offer theoretical explanations and trace the motivations for graffiti and street art. The first three provide theoretical interpretations related to these practices and the city: graffiti and street art images – in their physical form – are appreciated as ornaments, that is, embedded in the architectonic structures that host them (Schacter); graffiti and street art, through various processes of appropriation and co-optation, are understood as a means of added value for specific places and new urban governance strategies (Brighenti); and, in a similar vein, they are seen as practices capable of producing specific images that can be used to promote particular ideas about place-making and city-branding (Evans). The other three chapters discuss issues related to the practitioners, such as the gendered identity building within the subculture (Macdonald), the potential subcultural career perspectives for graffers and street artists (Snyder), and the psychological factors that lead adolescents and young adults to engage in these practices (Taylor, Pooleu and Carragher). Part Three is the largest part of the volume and consists of twelve chapters examining the diverse regional and municipal variations of graffiti and street art around the globe. Examples from the USA (Austin; Piano), Canada (Wacławek), Chile (Palmer), the UK (Ross), France (Fieni), Portugal (Campos), Egypt (Abaza), Palestine (Peteet), Japan (Yamakoshi and Sekine), China and Hong Kong (Valjakka), are offered. The contributors to this section review the past and current protagonists of their local scenes while discussing symbolic pieces, dominant images, or specific norms shared in each case. The vast majority of the chapters adopt ethnographic methods to study graffiti and street art scenes at a city level, which are then generalised to regional, or even continental, scales in order to understand the prominence that particular areas enjoy in the graffiti world. This somewhat problematic move between scales is the result of the methodological limitations of ethnography and acknowledged by Ross – in the corresponding opening text of this section – who considers the insights stemming from every local scene competent, regardless of their limited geographical focus. Part Four explores the effects of graffiti and street art, that is, their societal perception and the responses of the public. The seven chapters of this section touch upon subjects related to authorities’ reactions, media representations, and institutional appropriations that these practices attract. They trace the responses to graffiti and street art coming from a variety of agents, such as municipal authorities (Ross), press (Kramer), art market (Bengtsen), film industry (Ross), moral entrepreneurs (Bloch), legal system (Schwender), and gallery world (Wells). The chapters examine various strategies of graffiti and street art management that span from legal reactions and law enforcement, to deterrence, removal, and diversion programmes. The offered approaches in this section often remain peripheral in the graffiti and street art discourse, despite the fact that they play a key role in shaping our understanding and appreciation of these practices (for example, graffiti and copyright law, especially in the graffiti world following the recent H&M v. Revok lawsuit). Ultimately, this last part engages with a core issue associated with graffiti and street art, that is, the recurring tension between their legal and illegal nature. The volume concludes with a useful glossary and chronology of graffiti and street art. One of the biggest strengths of the book is that it brings different types of graffiti together, thus moving beyond the post-1970s New York style writing form. Further, several important and recurring themes related to graffiti and street art are addressed by acclaimed scholars. One topic that might have deserved more space, however, is the significant role that new technologies play in reshaping these practices. The geographical coverage and multi-national focus of the volume is also noteworthy, despite the fact that it is Western-centred. Even though it remains on the side of social sciences, the book is a truly interdisciplinary one reflecting the multifaceted nature of graffiti and street art. The volume celebrates the different disciplinary starting points of those who examine these artforms, ranging from sociology, criminology, and art history, to legal, urban, and visual studies. Ross engages enthusiastically with the dynamic and constantly-evolving nature of graffiti and street art while capturing the urban processes, key agents and theoretical discourses that inform our understanding of these practices. The Handbook is a must read for every scholar interested in the subject matter and would appeal to anyone who would like a complete introduction to the key issues surrounding graffiti and street art in different historical, spatial and legal contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Howard Journal of Crime and JusticeSame topicPublic Spaces through ArtFrench-language works237,207