MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2920473725 · doi:10.1117/12.2504672

A physiologically-based framework for the simulation of skin tanning dynamics

2019· article· en· W2920473725 on OpenAlexaff
Tenn F. Chen, Gladimir V. G. Baranoski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamics (music)Computer scienceHuman–computer interactionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive understanding about the dynamics of time-dependent, photoinduced physiological processes affecting the spectral attributes and, consequently, the appearance of human tissues is essential for new advances in biology, medicine, biomedical photonics and computer graphics, just to name a few fields that can benefit from it. Skin is arguably the most investigated of these complex biological systems. Its interactions with light have been the object of extensive studies aimed at a wide range of applications, from the detection and treatment of diseases to the synthesis of realistic images for educational and entertainment purposes. However, the dynamics of photoinduced physiological processes leading to skin appearance changes over time remains an open research topic. In this paper, we address the effects of tanning, one of the most prominent and persistent photobiological phenomena leading to such appearance changes. More specifically, we present a novel physiologically-based framework for the simulation of skin tanning dynamics, and describe how it can be employed in the visualization of the tanning-induced variations on skin’s spectral attributes. Its first-principles algorithms explicitly account for the connections between spectrally-dependent light stimuli and time-dependent physiological reactions occurring within the cutaneous tissues. This enables the effective simulation of these tissues’ main mechanisms of adaptation to ultraviolet radiation. As a result, nonlinear skin appearance changes elicited by distinct light exposure regimes can be correctly reproduced. We demonstrate the predictive capabilities of the proposed framework through quantitative and qualitative comparisons of its outcomes with measurements and experimental observations reported in the literature. We believe that it provides a high-fidelity testbed for interdisciplinary research involving time-dependent skin responses to light exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSkin Protection and AgingFrench-language works237,207