Micropipette Aspiration of Single Cells for Both Mechanical and Electrical Characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cellular physical properties have been identified to reflect cell states. Existing techniques are able to characterize either mechanical or electrical properties of a cell. This paper presents a micropipette aspiration technique that enables the characterization of both mechanical (instantaneous elastic modulus, equilibrium elastic modulus, and viscosity), and electrical (specific membrane capacitance) properties of the same single cell. Two bladder cancer cell lines (RT4 and T24) with different metastatic potential were used to evaluate the technique. The results showed that high-grade bladder cancer cells (T24, grade III) possess lower viscosity, lower elastic modulus, and larger SMC than the low-grade cancer cells (RT4, grade I). The Naive Bayes classifier was utilized to assess the classification accuracy using single-physical and multi-physical parameters. The classification results confirmed that the use of multi-biophysical parameters resulted in higher accuracy (97.5%), sensitivity (100%), and specificity (95.2%) than the use of a single-physical parameter for distinguishing T24 and RT4 cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".