VHost-Classifier: virus-host classification using natural language processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: When analyzing viral metagenomic sequences, it is often desired to filter the results of a BLAST analysis by the host species of the virus. VHost-Classifier automates this procedure using a natural language processing algorithm written in Python 3, which takes a list of taxonomic identifiers (taxids) returned from a BLAST query using viral sequences as input. The taxid output is binned by the evolutionary lineage of their host, based on string matching the words in their English names. If VHost-Classifier cannot identify a host, it attempts to bin the sequences by the environment from which the sample originated. VHost-Classifier predicts the evolutionary lineage of the host from the virus name and does not rely on referencing taxids against a database; therefore, it is not constrained by the size of a database and can host classify newly characterized viruses. RESULTS: Benchmarked on a test dataset of 1000 randomly selected viral taxids on the NCBI taxonomy database, VHost-Classifier assigned, with 100% accuracy, a host to the rank of Class for >93% of viruses, and to the rank of Family for >37% of viruses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: For more information about VHost-Classifier as well as implementation instructions, visit https://github.com/Kzra/VHost-Classifier. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".