Erectile dysfunction in patients with haemophilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients with haemophilia (PWH) are experiencing a nearly normal life span with safe factor replacement therapy and effective antiviral treatments for co-infections. As a result, many ageing-related health issues are starting to emerge. One rarely discussed health issue is erectile dysfunction (ED). ED can affect overall well-being and predict future cardiac events, but is not well studied in PWH. AIM: This prospective study aims to examine the prevalence and risk factors for ED in PWH using the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. METHODS: Patients with haemophilia A and B at all severities were invited to participate in IIEF questionnaire at the provincial Hemophilia Treatment Centre. Risk factors for ED including cardiovascular risk factors, prior surgeries, viral infections, medications and haemophilia-specific factors were obtained. Fasting laboratory tests including but not limited to renal function, haemoglobin, lipid profile, glucose and CRP were performed the same day. Blood pressure and anthropomorphic indices were measured. Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD and hyperaemic velocity time integral [VTI]). RESULTS: Out of the 56 subjects approached, 44 completed the IIEF. Median age was 49 years. About 38.6% of the cohort reported ED symptoms. There was no significant difference in endothelial function measured by FMD and VTI between patient with ED and without. IIEF score correlated with age in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Erectile dysfunction symptoms appear prevalent in PWH, particularly in the older group. This disorder along with the underlying causes needs to be explored further in future larger observational study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".